Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securitas Security Services, Inc. v. Daniel et al
as 3:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Securitas Security Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Daniel and Prosegur Security, Inc.
MOTIVATED SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. BLACK
as 2:2022cv04449
Plaintiff:
MOTIVATED SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
LIZA BLACK
MOTIVATED SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. BLACK
as 3:2022cv04449
Plaintiff:
MOTIVATED SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
LIZA BLACK
David Thompson v. Regions Security Services, Inc
as 21-10954
Defendant / Appellee:
REGIONS SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID THOMPSON
Agma Security Service, Inc. v. US
as 21-1716
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
RANGER AMERICAN OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AGMA SECURITY SERVICE, INC.
Alfred Caraffa v. USDC-AZP
as 20-71782
Not Classified By Court:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, Tempe Police Officers 1-5, PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALLIED UNIVERSAL and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Petitioner:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA
Patrick Bradford v. ProTech Security Services Inc., et al
as 20-16190
Defendant:
SERGIO REYES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PATRICK BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellant:
PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Alfred Caraffa v. Tempe Police Department, et al
as 20-16151
Defendant / Appellee:
TRIDENT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., UNKNOWN PARTY, Allied Universal Security Guard, UNKNOWN PARTY, Manager of the Tempe Public Historical Library and others
Defendant:
GUAJARDO, UNKNOWN PARTY, Chief of Police in Tempe and UNKNOWN PARTY, Mayor of Tempe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
