Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ahmed v. Garland
as 24-1284
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD SHAMIM AHMED, RUJY BEGUM and SAMIRA BEGUM
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ebrahimi v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
United States of America, President Joseph R Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ebrahimi v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
United States of America, President Joseph R Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stone v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Philip Stone
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., J. Warren Huff, Christy J. Oliger and others
Wang v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07525
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., J. Warren Huff, Christy J. Oliger and others
Taylor v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07532
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., J. Warren Huff, Christy J. Oliger and others
Lifschitz v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07481
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifschitz
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martin W. Edwards, R. Kent McGaughy, Jr. and others
O'Dell v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07397
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., J. Warren Huff, Christy J. Oliger and others
Safi v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv03715
Plaintiff:
Shamim Bibi Safi and Alamzaib Safi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Donald Blome and Anthony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ebrahimi v. Fields
as 3:2022cv01906
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Mykill Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
