Cases 1 - 10 of 156
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Western Watersheds Project, et al. v. Perdue, et al.
as 23-3872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization and WILDERNESS WATCH, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
SONNY PERDUE, as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency and others
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Melvin Robertson v. Raphael Warnock, et al
as 21-14481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPHAEL G. WARNOCK, SONNY PERDUE, Individual and Official Capacity, THURBERT BAKER, Individual and Official Capacity and others
City of Red Oak, Texas v. AGRI
as 21-51123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Red Oak, Texas and Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, acting by and through George Ervin "Sonny" Perdue, III, Secretary of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, acting by and through Edd Hargett, State Director, Rockett Special Utility District and others
Ranchers Cattlemen, et al v. USDA, et al
as 21-8042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANCHERS CATTLEMEN ACTION LEGAL FUND UNITED STOCKGROWERS OF AMERICA, TRACY HUNT, DONNA HUNT, DBA The MW Cattle Company LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SECRETARY, in his official capacity, AKA Sonny Perdue and others
Donald Lankford v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, et al
as 21-3269
Defendant / Appellee:
SONNY PERDUE, JOHN RICHARD SHREWSBERRY, MONTGOMERY, OH COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD K. LANKFORD
Apache Stronghold v. USA, et al
as 21-15295
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, TOM TORRES, Acting Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APACHE STRONGHOLD, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
Amicus Curiae:
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LAW SCHOLARS, NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS, A TRIBAL ELDER, AND OTHER FEDERAL INDIAN LAW SCHOLARS AND ORGANIZATIONS, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, THE SIKH COALITION, AND PROTECT THE 1st and others
MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2021cv00475
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, currently Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Homeland Security, currently identified as Peter T. Gaynor in an acting capacity, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, currently Dr. Ben Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Ark of Freedom Alliance, American Atheists, Hindu American Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Perdue et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Ed Holloway, Jr., United States Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project and Wilderness Watch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
