Cases 1 - 10 of 21
People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York et al v. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, by Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of the State of California, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, by Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, The State of Minnesota, by Keith Ellison, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
Brian P. Brooks, in his official capacity as Acting Comptroller of the Currency, The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Brian P. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Outreach Calling, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07505
Defendant:
Outsource 3000, Inc., Outreach Calling, Inc., Damian Muziani and others
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Federal Trade Commission, Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and Paul R. Rodriguez, Acting Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv19323
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GURBIR S. GREWAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as NJ/3:19-CV-14734
Plaintiff:
GURBIR S. GREWAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
KIETT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2017mc00002
Petitioner:
RALPH KIETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
ADAMO v. JONES et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
DAMARIS ADAMO
Defendant:
LINDA GRASSO JONES, LAWRENCE M. LAWSON, STUART RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ALINTOFF v. ESCANDON et al
as 2:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL ALINTOFF
Defendant:
PAUL X. ESCANDON, BRYAN ALINTOFF, LINDA GRASSO JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NCAA, et al v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 14-4569
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, NBA, a joint venture, NHL, an unincorporated association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, DAVID L. REBUCK, Director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and Assistant Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, FRANK ZANZUCCKI, Executive Director of the New Jersey Racing Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NEW JERSEY THOROUGHBRED HORSEMENS ASSOCIATION INC
NCAA, et al v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 14-4568
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, NBA, a joint venture, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, DAVID L. REBUCK, Director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and Assistant Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, FRANK ZANZUCCKI, Executive Director of the New Jersey Racing Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VINCENT PRIETO, Speaker of the New Jersey General Assembly and STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of the New Jersey Senate
NCAA, et al v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 14-4546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, NATIONAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, DAVID L. REBUCK, Director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and Assistant Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and FRANK ZANZUCCKI, Executive Director of the New Jersey Racing Commission
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY THOROUGHBRED HORSEMENS ASSOCIATION INC, NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of the New Jersey Senate and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
