Cases 1 - 10 of 14
State Of Texas et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Patrick J Lechleiter, United States Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Plaintiff:
State of South Carolina, State of Wyoming, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State Of Texas et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Kansas and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy Miller, Office of Management and Budget and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Moates v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Moates
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., State of Georgia, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Texas et al v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, Jennifer Granholm, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy, Scott De La Vega, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party:
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant:
Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant:
M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff:
M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent:
Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada , State Of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Thomas E. Perez, The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 4:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Thomas E Perez, Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor The and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Plano Chamber of Commerce , Texas Association of Business , Allen-Fairview Chamber of Commerce and others
Consol_defendant:
Thomas E Perez , David Weil and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 7:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Kentucky, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Education, United States Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae:
Governor C. L. "Butch" Otter, State of Washington, Letitia James, Public Advocate for the City of New York and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Rachel Jona Tudor, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Charlsa Suzanne Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
