Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al
as 1:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
DRS. LUTINS & BENITEZ, P.A. v. DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv01247
Defendant:
DELTA DENTAL OF WISCONSIN, DELTA DENTAL OF RHODE ISLAND, DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY-GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
DRS. LUTINS & BENITEZ, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
L&M Companies, Inc. et al v. Unique Food Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
L&M Companies, Inc. and Palumbo Foods, LLC
Defendant:
Gina D. Bissette, Bissette Brothers, LLC, Louis J. Deangelis and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ford's Produce Company, Select Funding, LLC, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Christopher J Waivers and John C. Bircher, III
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Cheney v. CFT Auto Investors, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00211
Defendant:
CFT Auto Investors, LLC, Hendrick Automotive Group, Hendrick Toyota of Wilmington and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Neil Cheney
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation v. Carolinas Creative Counseling, P.A.
as 3:2018cv00265
Plaintiff:
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation
Defendant:
Carolinas Creative Counseling, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NORTH TEXAS MESBIC, INC.
as 1:2013mc00038
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NORTH TEXAS MESBIC, INC.
United States v. North Texas MESBIC, Inc.
as 3:2013mc00119
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
North Texas MESBIC, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
