Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Texas Public Policy v. U.S. Dept. of State
as 24-50189
Plaintiff:
Texas Public Policy Foundation
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Texas Public Policy Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Texas Public Policy Foundation
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Texas Public Policy Foundation v. United States Department of Energy
as 1:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Texas Public Policy Foundation
Defendant:
United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Texas Public Policy Foundation v. United States Department of State
as 1:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
Texas Public Policy Foundation
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Texas Public Policy Foundation v. United States Department of Commerce
as 1:2022cv01210
Plaintiff:
Texas Public Policy Foundation
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice v. Paxton
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-55395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
American Hospital Association, et al v. Alex Azar, II
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-5193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Association of American Medical Colleges, National Association of Children's Hospitals, Bothwell Regional Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Amicus Curiae:
The Connecticut Hospital Association, The Texas Hospital Association, The Healthcare Association of Hawaii and others
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION et al v. AZAR
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2019cv03619
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM, BOTHWELL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Amicus Curiae:
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION, PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATE.ORG, ASSOCIATION OF MATURE AMERICAN CITIZENS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.