Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC)
as 24-727
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC, STRATEGIC FS BUFFALO, LLC, STRATEGIC NYC, LLC and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Stratfs,
as 24-719
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
THE BLUST FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST THROUGH DONALD J. HOLMGREN, TRUSTEE, Relief Defendant, STRATFS, LLC, formerly known as Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC, STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Blust
as 24-583
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
JASON BLUST, STRATFS, LLC, formerly known as Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC, STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Moore Legal Group, LLC
as 24-554
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
MOORE LEGAL GROUP, LLC, CLEAR CREEK LEGAL, LLC, CREDIT ADVOCATES LAW FIRM, LLC and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Stratfs, LLC
as 24-697
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
RYAN SASSON, STRATFS, LLC, formerly known as Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC, STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC), et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner:
Fidelis Legal Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6102 Telemarketing rules
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
