Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Perez-Arritola v. Plaza de Diego, S.E. et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Mr. David J Perez-Arritola and David J. Perez-Arritola
Defendant:
Plaza de Diego, S.E., Carlos L Garca-Muiz, Garca-Sol Conjugal Partnership and others
Espada et al v. Salud Integral en la Montana, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Teofilo Espada, Cherrylin Espada, Nayeli C. Espada and others
Defendant:
Salud Integral en la Montana, Inc., Mennonite General Hospital, David J. Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cangrejeros de Santurce Baseball Club, LLC et al v. Liga de Beisbol Profesional de Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
CANGREJEROS DE SANTURCE BASEBALL CLUB, LLC, SANTURCE MERCHANDISING, LLC and Thomas Axon
Defendant:
LIGA DE BEISBOL PROFESIONAL DE PUERTO RICO, INC., CRIOLLOS MANAGEMENT, INC., RA-12, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Santiago-Martinez, et al v. Fundacion Damas, Inc.
as 21-1718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YANIRA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ, in representation of minor J.R.S. and RAYMOND RAMIREZ-CARABALLO, in representation of minor J.R.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
FUNDACION DAMAS, INC., d/b/a Hospital Damas, Inc., JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, and his wife Jane Doe, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership
Defendant:
HOSPITAL DAMAS, INC., or, alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Damas, JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, in representation of his Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of her Conjugal Partnership
Santos-Arrieta, et al v. Hospital Del Maestro, Inc., et al
as 19-1935
Defendant / Appellee:
HOSPITAL DEL MAESTRO, or alternatively, John Doe Corporation, d/b/a Hospital Del Maestro and CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
G.Q.S., minor represented by their parents Damaris Santos-Arrieta and Gustavo Querales-Salcedo, DAMARIS SANTOS-ARRIETA, and Gustavo Querales Salcedo, in representation of their minor son GQS, GUSTAVO QUERALES-SALCEDO, and Damaris Santos Arrieta, in representation of their minor son GQS and others
Defendant:
PUERTO RICO MEDICAL DEFENSE INSURANCE CO., FELIX VILLAR-ROBLES, and his wife Jane Doe, in representation of their conjugal partnership, JANE DOE, and her husband Felix Villar Robles, in representation of their conjugal partnership and others
In Re: Santos-Arrieta, et al
as 19-1837
Respondent:
PUERTO RICO MEDICAL DEFENSE INSURANCE CO., CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HOSPITAL DE MAESTRO, INC., or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Del Maestro and others
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO QUERALES-SALCEDO, and Damaris Santos Arrieta, in representation of their minor son G.Q.S, G.Q.S., minor represented by their parents Damaris Santos-Arrieta and Gustavo Querales-Salcedo and DAMARIS SANTOS-ARRIETA, and Gustavo Querales Salcedo, in representation of their minor son G.Q.S.
Alcon Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Finkelstein-Ponce-de-Leon et al
as 3:2019cv01755
Defendant:
Nicolas Finkelstein-Ansaldi, Ariel Finkelstein-Ponce-de-Leon, Conjugal Partnership Finkelstein-Ansaldi and others
Plaintiff:
Alcon Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Puerto Rico Telephone Company v. Ayala-Rivera, et al
as 19-1718
Defendant / Appellant:
CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP AYALA-ROSADO, XIOMARA ROSADO-CARTAGENA, INGRID RAMOS-MATOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Claro
Defendant:
JANE DOE 1
Pagan-Caraballo et al v. Puerto Rico Farm Credit, ACA et al
as 3:2019cv01649
Defendant:
Ricardo L Fernandez, Jorge A Dulzaides-Gonzalez, Mrs. Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Pagan-Perez, Juan Pagan-Caraballo, XYZ Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Vazquez-Ramos et al v. Triple S Salud, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01527
Plaintiff:
Javier E Colon-Irizarry, West Urology Group PSC, Caribbean Urocentre, CSP and others
Defendant:
MSO of Puerto Rico, LLC, ABC Insurance Company, Hector M Rodriguez-Blazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
