Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Haas et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
HEATHER HAAS and TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States v. Ricky Williams
as 23-2383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Ricky Timothy Williams
Scott v. Williams
as 2:2023cv04008
Petitioner:
Chiffon Scott
Respondent:
Timothy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States v. Ricky Williams
as 23-2149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ricky Timothy Williams
US v. Timothy Bavaro
as 23-4209
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY WILLIAM BAVARO
Beauchamp et al v. Beauchamp
as 8:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Beauchamp and Timothy Corde Beauchamp
Defendant:
James L Beauchamp and James L. Beauchamp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Kim & Cynthia of El Paso, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Kim & Cynthia of El Paso, LLC doing business as Two Five Dive Bar, Laura M. Parga-Flores doing business as Two Five Dive Bar, Mike Jr. Flores doing business as Two Five Dive Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Ballard v. ChannelAdvisor Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
ChannelAdvisor Corporation, Timothy Buckley, David Spitz and others
Weiss v. Channeladvisor Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09129
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Channeladvisor Corporation, Timothy Buckley, David Spitz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05866
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
