Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pat v. Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv06310
Plaintiff:
Arnold Pat and Pat Arnold
Defendant:
Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
French v. Tribune Publishing Company
as 1:2022cv07158
Plaintiff:
Ronald French
Defendant:
Tribune Publishing Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Daniel D'Ambly, et al v. Christian Exoo, et al
as 22-3034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D'AMBLY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN EXOO, a/k/a Antifash Gordon, ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY, TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO LLC and others
Defendant:
COHEN WEISS AND SIMON LLP
Carlsen v. Tribune Publishing Company et al
as 1:2021cv02485
Defendant:
Christopher Minnetian, Randall D. Smith, Dana Goldsmith Needleman and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carlsen
Ciccotelli v. Tribune Publishing Company et al
as 1:2021cv03986
Defendant:
Christopher Minnetian, Randall D. Smith, Terry Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Wang v. Tribune Publishing Company et al
as 1:2021cv03779
Defendant:
Christopher Minnetian, Randall D. Smith, Terry Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Moore v. Tribune Publishing Company
as 1:2020cv07666
Defendant:
Tribune Publishing Company
Plaintiff:
George Moore
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
D'AMBLY v. EXOO et al
as 2:2020cv12880
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN EXOO, VIJAYA GADDE, ANTIFASH GORDON and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D'AMBLY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
PATTERSON v. LYON et al
as 1:2020cv00802
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC., NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., FOX CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00688
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC., NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., FOX CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
