Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AGABA et al v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Not Classified By Court:
Mr. Agaba Shafi, Mr. David Ndawula, Mr. Didas Rutatskwa and others
Defendant:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC., CONSTELLIS/TRIPLE CANOPY and CONSTELLIS GROUP, INC.
Claimant:
Mr. Stephen Eliabu and Mr. William Mwasinje
Plaintiff:
SHAFI AGABA, DAVID NDAWULA, DIDAS RUTATSIKWA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hebert et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 6:2021cv00545
Defendant:
Academi, Turley Law Firm, John Owen Brennan and others
Plaintiff:
John Keith Hebert and International Defense Corp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Triple Canopy, Inc. v. Secretary of Defense
as 20-2165
Appellant:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC.
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Triple Canopy, Inc., et al v. Director, OWCP, et al
as 17-10863
Petitioner:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. and ALLIED WORLD NATIONAL AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OWCP, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and STEVEN RITZHEIMER
:
SERVICE
Triple Canopy, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Labor et al
as 3:2016cv00739
Petitioner:
Triple Canopy, Inc. and Allied World National Assurance Company
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Labor , Steven Ritzheimer and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Triple Canopy, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 16-11584
Petitioner:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. and ALLIED WORLD NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN RITZHEIMER and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
United States ex rel. Omar Bad v. Triple Canopy, Inc.
as 13-2190
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL. OMAR BADR
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC.
United States ex rel. Omar Bad v. Triple Canopy, Inc.
as 13-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. OMAR BADR
Defendant - Appellee:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC.
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
