Cases 1 - 10 of 27
USA v. Troy Williams, Sr.
as 24-10953
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TROY WILLIAMS, SR.
Haynes, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3327
Plaintiff:
CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS and others
Not Yet Classified:
GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES, ATTORNEY, counsel for plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv24672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Rodney Williams
as 22-7069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY TROY WILLIAMS
Troy Williams v. Woody Howard, et al
as 21-3084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
Woody Howard, James B. Reynolds, Medical Director, Farmington State Hospital and others
USA v. Anthony Williams
as 20-10354
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY TROY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Jones (Allums)
as 20-2289
Defendant / Appellant:
Yonell Allums, AKA Unk
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ralph Hooper, AKA Rizzo, AKA Riz, Dean Jones, AKA Korrupt, Kaheim Allums, AKA Os, AKA "O," and others
Troy Williams v. Linda Jones, et al
as 20-2368
Defendant / Appellee:
Debbie Bryan, Medical Doctor, Mitch Connell, Senator, Robert Mays, Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Williams
Anthony Williams v. USDC-HI
as 20-70994
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and In re: ANTHONY TROY WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
ANTHONY TROY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Troy Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-12796
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
