Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mark Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-5217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Jordan
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Carvajal, Director, U.S. Bureau of Prisons
MARTINEZ-BROOKS v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv11307
Plaintiff:
DIANTHE MARTINEZ-BROOKS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03504
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jaber v. Carvajal
as 20-3509
Petitioner:
Faouzi Abdoul-Menhem Jaber
Respondent:
Michael D. Carvajal, Director of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Judge Colleen McMahon
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv02272
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SHIPP v. HURWITZ et al
as 1:2019cv01733
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and HUGH J. HURWITZ
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHIPP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Azzara v. McFarland
as 19-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Azzara
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick McFarland, in his individual capacity, U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Larry Mangum v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv05056
Plaintiff:
Larry Mangum
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ortiz, Correctional Officer Ortiz, Correctional Officer Pacheco and others
HALL v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL HALL
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kenneth Leaming v. USDC-WAWSE
as 13-70125
:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN DOE, Warden, FDC-SEATAC, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
