Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Associated Grocers, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01561
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Associated Grocers, Inc., Action Meat Distributors, Inc., Affiliated Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Associated Grocers, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02525
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED GROCERS, INC., Action Meat Distributors, Inc., Affiliated Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Unipro Foodservice, Inc. v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv02757
Plaintiff:
Unipro Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Unipro Foodservice, Inc. v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06553
Plaintiff:
UNIPRO FOODSERVICE, INC.
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UniPro Foodservices, Inc. et al v. Sysco Corporation
as 1:2015mi00028
Plaintiff:
UniPro Foodservices, Inc. and Roger Toomey
Defendant:
Sysco Corporation
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party:
DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner:
XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
