Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
AAR v. Jehmal Hudson
as 24-1399
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS
Defendant: JEHMAL T. HUDSON, in his Individual Capacity and Official Capacity as a Comissioner of the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia, MICHAEL ROLBAND, in his Individual Capacity and Official Capacity as the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and STEPHEN BRICH, in his Individual Capacity and Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation
Northern Virginia Citizens Association, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff: Northern Virginia Citizens Association, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, Virginia Department of Transportation, W. Sheppard Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 National Environmental Policy Act
David Barrow v. Gary Williams
as 21-7593
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID JAMES BARROW
Defendant / Appellee: GARY WILLIAMS, GARY T. SETTLE, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Bruce & Tanya & Associates v. Board of Supervisors, Fairfax
as 19-1153
Defendant / Appellant: FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRUCE & TANYA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant: STEPHEN BRICH, As Commissioner of Highways for Commonwealth of Virginia, JACK WEYANT, As Director of Department of Code Compliance and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bruce & Tanya & Associates v. Board of Supervisors, Fairfax We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUCE & TANYA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN BRICH, As Commissioner of Highways for Commonwealth of Virginia, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA and FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant: JACK WEYANT, As Director of Department of Code Compliance and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bruce & Tanya & Associates, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01155
Plaintiff: Bruce & Tanya & Associates, Inc.
Defendant: Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia, Fairfax County, Virginia, Jack Weyant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moats v. Monongalia County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff: Kenneth Moats, Sr.
Defendant: Monongalia County and West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Clear Sky Car Wash LLC v. City of Chesapeake, Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1492
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLEAR SKY CAR WASH LLC, CLEAR SKY CAR WASH OPERATING LLC, SAMUEL JACKNIN, founder, owner and managing agent of Clear Sky and others
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, CAROLE GILLESPIE, natural person, individually and in her capacity as City Right of Way Manager, GREENHORNE & O'MARA, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Greenhorne & O'Mara Consulting Engineers, and in its capacity as and for the City and others
Virginia Department of Transportation et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00775
Plaintiff: Virginia Department of Transportation and Board of Supervisors, Fairfax County, Virginia
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa P. Jackson, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region III and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Clear Sky Car Wash LLC et al v. City of Chesapeake Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00194
Plaintiff: Clear Sky Car Wash LLC , Clear Sky Car Wash Operating LLC , Samuel Jacknin and others
Defendant: City of Chesapeake Virginia, Carole Gillespie, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?