Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fortune v. The City of Logan et al
as 2:2020cv00339
Plaintiff:
Travis Fortune
Defendant:
The City of Logan
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Health Care Justice Foundation, PBC et al v. Huntington Bank Inc. Officials & Agents et al
as 1:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
US Coalition For Familes & Children Foundation, PBC, Health Care Justice Foundation, PBC, Nabil G. Guirguis and others
Defendant:
Huntington Bank Inc. Officials & Agents, Frank DeMarco, Brad Pustoloski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harshaw v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2016cv03678
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Harshaw, Jr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Austin G. Burke , Travis Crook and others
Movant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In Re Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Fitzwater
as 2:2012mc00132
Petitioner:
Lawyer Disciplinary Board
Respondent:
Travis R. Fitzwater
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Akers v. Andes
as 2:2009cv00478
Plaintiff:
Travis Akers
Defendant:
Teresa Marie Andes
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999 Report cause code (DO NOT DELETE!)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
