Cases 1 - 10 of 24
v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02395
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
United States of America v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02396
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Conneran v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60986
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Conneran
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Barrientos v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05160
Plaintiff:
JULIANA BARRIENTOS
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rodgers v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02883
Plaintiff:
Kim Rodgers
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DDK Hotels, LLC v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 20-2748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DDK Hotels, LLC and DDK/WE Hotels Management, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DDK/WE Hospitality Partners, LLC
Lopez v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 20-2512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor Lopez, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
Naomi Murphrey v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 19-20875
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INCORPORATED, doing business as Pottery Barn, formerly doing business as Williams-Sonoma, Incorporated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAOMI MURPHREY
RUSHING v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
as 3:2018mc80128
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA INC
Plaintiff:
William Rushing
Rushing et al v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mc80122
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Advertising, Inc., Williams-Sonoma DTC, Inc., William-Sonoma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Rushing
Petitioner:
The Pond Lady, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
