Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Ying Chen v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3939
Petitioner:
YING CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Huy-Ying Chen v. Court of Appeals of the State of Washington - Divi
as 22-70165
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HUY-YING CHEN, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, as Trustee for Residential Asset Mortgage Products Inc., Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates of Series 2005-RP3, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Successor in Interest to the Chase Manhattan Bank NA fka Chase Manhattan Bank and others
Petitioner:
HUY-YING CHEN
Respondent:
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON - DIVISION 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Topway Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03214
Defendant:
Topway Enterprises, Inc., Adwin Liao, Jeff Liao and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 0301
Chen v. Barr
as 19-2658
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xing Ying Chen
Ying Chen v. William Barr
as 19-70084
Petitioner:
YING CHEN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
United States of America v. $27,683 In U.S. Currency et al
as 0:2018mc00078
Defendant:
$3,300 in U.S. Currency, $1,675 in U.S. Currency, $30,000 in U.S. Currency and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Shaofen Hoa, Juan Juan Du, Xain Mei Zhang and others
Chen v. Sessions
as 18-2080
Petitioner:
Ying Chen, AKA Jin Liang Pan
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Chen v. Sessions
as 17-2340
Petitioner:
Ying Chen
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Chen v. Lynch
as 16-3124
Petitioner:
Xian Ying Chen
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 14-356
Petitioner:
Xiu Xing Chen, AKA Xiu Ying Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
