Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jeannite v. Sorokin et al
as 1:2023cv12854
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
J. Sorokin doing business as judge at supreme court and Young doing business as judge at supreme court
Lu v. Saylor et al
as 1:2022cv11106
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
F. Dennis Saylor, Jon David Levin, Patti B. Saris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bellingham Fruit and Produce, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv10975
Plaintiff:
Bellingham Fruit and Produce, Inc. and Young Soo Chung
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Healey
as 1:2020cv11832
Defendant:
Maura Healey
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548
United States of America v. Donald et al
as 4:2017mc94036
Defendant:
Daniel Donald and Robert Young
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System v. OvaScience, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12312
Plaintiff:
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System
Defendant:
OvaScience, Inc., Michelle Dipp, Jeffrey E. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
DAHHAN v. OvaScience, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10511
Plaintiff:
FADI DAHHAN
Defendant:
OvaScience, Inc., Michelle Dipp and Jeffrey E. Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Demos v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. et al
as 1:2016cv12235
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Union Pacific Corp., James R. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
