Cases 1 - 10 of 76
New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. RTX Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant:
RTX Corporation, Gregory Hayes, Neil Mitchill and others
Petitioner:
William Chow, Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefits Fund and United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 WBPA Fund
Peneycad v. RTX Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01035
Defendant:
RTX Corporation, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Gregory Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Peneycad
Interested Party:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice
Amicus Curiae:
Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice
as 3:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Grant v Wells Frgo, et al
as 3:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Gary Grant
Defendant:
Wells Frgo, Tim Sian, Charles W. Scharf and others
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Candlestick Capital Management LP et al
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Candlestick Capital Management LP, Candlestick Master Fund LP and Candlestick US F&F Fund LP
Flynn et al v. Duff et al
as 3:2022mc00096
Plaintiff:
John J. Flynn, John Does, Phil Marie and others
Defendant:
Bob Duff, Themis Klarides, AT&T Wireless and others
Petitioner:
City of Stamford Police Department
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
