Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Peeples et al v. Campbell et al
as 4:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachel Campbell, David McCormick, James Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bio Gen LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, John Timothy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
USA v. One Financial Corporation
as 5:2016mc00024
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
One Financial Corporation
Respondent:
One Bank & Trust, N.A. and Tom Prince
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Neeley v. 5 Federal Communications Commissioners et al
as 5:2014cv05135
Plaintiff:
Curtis J Neeley, Jr.
Defendant:
5 Federal Communications Commissioners, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, et al, Steve Womack and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2255
Edwards et al v. Beck et al
as 4:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Louis Jerry Edwards and Tom Tvedten
Defendant:
Joseph M Beck , Omar Atiq , Harold B Betton and others
Movant:
Concepts of Truth Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv03058
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, United States Department of Justice, Tom J. Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Paslidis et al
as 4:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
Tom Jackson
Defendant:
Nick Paslidis, Donna Soodalter-Toman and Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care
Movant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Winrock Grass Farms Inc v. Affiliated Real Estate Appraisers of Arkansas et al
as 4:2007mc00013
Plaintiff:
Winrock Grass Farms Inc and Winrock Grass Farms Inc
Defendant:
Affiliated Real Estate Appraisers of Arkansas Inc, Tom Ferstl and Metropolitan National Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
