Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Basson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Basson
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , CitiMortgage, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Courchevel 1850 LLC v. Pierre
as 1:2017cv02528
Plaintiff:
Courchevel 1850 LLC
Defendant:
Cavanes Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
PIERRE v. M & T BANK et al
as 2:2016cv08639
Plaintiff:
MELCHIOR PIERRE
Defendant:
M & T BANK , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS and DOES 1 TO 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Scott Kaseburg, et al v. Port of Seattle, et al
as 16-35768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT KASEBURG, KATHRYN KASEBURG, MARTIN FEDIGAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PORT OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC, COUNTY OF KING, a home rule charter county and others
Feiyue Wang et al v. Cameron Perrington et al
as 5:2016cv01900
Defendant:
Does, Pierre Johnson and Cameron Perrington
Plaintiff:
Feiyue Wang and Wei Xie
Pierre Noel v. Bank Of America, N.A.
as 9:2016cv81223
Plaintiff:
Yvanne Pierre Noel
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierre Maccagno v. Provident Funding Associates, et al
as 16-1973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIERRE MACCAGNO, An individual
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE and others
Plotkins v. Real Property Assessment Division
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Plotkins
Defendant:
Real Property Assessment Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierre et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jionel E. Pierre
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America Home Loans, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Georges v. Seterus, Inc.
as 9:2016cv80304
Plaintiff:
Pierre Georges
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
