Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Vaughn et al v. EverHome Mortgage Company
as 1:2010cv03069
Plaintiff:
Toyasha Vaughn and Charles Vaughn
Defendant:
EverHome Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
David Hamilton et al v. WMC Mortgage et al
as 2:2010cv06881
Defendant:
Consumer Solutions, LLC, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Hamilton and David Hamilton
Wood v. EverHome Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2010cv02786
Plaintiff:
Shelly Wood
Defendant:
EverHome Mortgage Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Tsukerman v. EverHome Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2010cv02649
Plaintiff:
Natalia B. Tsukerman
Defendant:
EverHome Mortgage Company and Ohio Saving Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Living v. EverHome Mortgage Company
as 1:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Angela Bywaters Living
Defendant:
EverHome Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Christain-Wayton v. EverHome Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2010cv02455
Plaintiff:
Erik: Christain-Wayton
Defendant:
EverHome Mortgage Company , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), Prospect Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Samuel Edwards v. EverHome Mortgage Company, et al
as 10-13125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY and HSBC BANK USA, National Association as Trustee for OMAC 2005-2
Ramirez v. EverHome Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2010cv02050
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Celis Ramirez
Defendant:
EverHome Mortgage Company and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jordan v. Everhome Mortgage Company
as 5:2010cv01777
Plaintiff:
Gaile Jordan
Defendant:
Everhome Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Everhome Mortgage Company v. Kiel et al
as 2:2010cv00209
Plaintiff:
Everhome Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Edward Kiel, April Kiel and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
