Cases 71 - 80 of 828,150
Giana v. Shein Distribution Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
Alan Giana
Defendant:
Shein Distribution Corporation, Roadget Business Pte., Ltd. doing business as d/b/a SHEIN, Shein Technology LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sax et al v. Bell Textron, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Amber Sax, Avery Rasmuson, Emily Baxter and others
Defendant:
Bell Textron, Inc., The Boeing Company, Rolls-Royce Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 al Diversity-Airline Crash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk11057
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk80189
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
S. A.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
B. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Lauren Welling
Petitioner:
S. B.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hart v. Regal
as 3:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Hart
Defendant:
Christina Regal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
801 MAINE AVE NBL OWNER LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
801 MAINE AVE NBL OWNER LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
