Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Queen Properties of LA, L.P. v. Kimshai Hooks
as 2:2023cv10513
Plaintiff:
Queen Properties of LA, L.P.
Defendant:
Kimshai Hooks
Daniel McCausland, et al v. Charter Township of Canton, MI, et al
as 23-1479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL MCCAUSLAND, ROBERT MCCAUSLAND and IMAC PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, MI, CHARLES LAROCQUE, TIM FAAS and others
Defendant:
PHILIP LAJOY and PAUL ZAKOS
SHORT v. EU et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
LATYSHA SHORT
Defendant:
HOOK SAN EU, STACEY SIN LAY, KOY BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hillman et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Smith, David A. Gordon, John Bankston and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hillman et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2021at00433
Plaintiff:
Robert S White, Kurtis M Barnes, Debra L Johnson and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Petitioner:
Earl Aubrey, Jr.
Receiver:
Amanda Strain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White Cloud Ranch LLC et al v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
JAMES B MITCHELL, WHITE CLOUD RANCH, LLC, THE LAWLER FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant:
United States of America
MARKET TOWER PROPERTY LLC v. HOOK-SUPERX L.L.C.
as 1:2020cv03115
Plaintiff:
Market Tower Property LLC
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX LCC d/b/a CVS PHARMACY, INC.. and HOOK-SUPERX L.L.C. doing business as CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
8655 Arlington Ave Multi LLC v. Aramis Hooks et al
as 5:2019cv02107
Plaintiff:
8655 Arlington Ave Multi LLC
Defendant:
Aramis Hooks and Does 1 to 10
Republic Waldorf Creek LP v. Hooks
as 1:2019cv04770
Plaintiff:
Republic Waldorf Creek LP
Defendant:
Leandria Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Republic Waldrop Creek LP v. Hooks
as 1:2019cv00442
Plaintiff:
Republic Waldrop Creek LP
Defendant:
Leandria Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
