Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC v. Unknown Spouse, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees And All Other Parties Claiming An Interest By, Through, Under Or Against The Estate Of Marie Woodberry Holloman et al
as 6:2023cv01314
Defendant:
Unknown Spouse, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees And All Other Parties Claiming An Interest By, Through, Under Or Against The Estate Of Marie Woodberry Holloman, Roosevelt E. Woodberry, Gwendolyn Woodberry and others
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shenandoah Hills Wind Project, LLC v. Page County, Iowa et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Shenandoah Hills Wind Project, LLC
Defendant:
Page County, Iowa, Page County Board of Supervisors, Page County Board of Adjustment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
King v. Commerce Bank
as 4:2015cv01422
Defendant:
Commerce Bank
Plaintiff:
Paul D. King
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
King et al v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11771
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D. King and Melisa A. King
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scutier v. King et al
as 3:2014cv00377
Defendant:
Leslie S. King and Lori D. King
Plaintiff:
Patricia Scutier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
King et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing et al
as 2:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. King and Jillyn P. King
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. King et al
as 2:2007cv01047
Plaintiff:
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Uneeka D. King, Unknown Spouse, if any, of Uneeka D. King, 7 Rent Com LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
