Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Weeks v. Town of Billerica et al
as 1:2020cv12228
Defendant:
Kristel Bennett, Marie O'Rourke, Mike Grady and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Weeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. GIROUX
as 1:2019cv00512
Plaintiff:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Defendant:
JUDY A GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giroux v. Village of Pinecrest
as 1:2017cv23392
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Giroux , Valerie Giruoux , Hamid Shantiai and others
Defendant:
Village of Pinecrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Giroux v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for CSMC Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-4
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Todd J. Giroux
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giroux v. Federal National Mortgage, et al
as 15-1270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAREL L. GIROUX
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Its Successor & Assigns, a/k/a Fannie Mae and MERSCORP, INC., Its Successor & Assigns
Giroux v. Property Direct et al
as 2:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
Denise Giroux
Defendant:
Property Direct, Leading Financial, Professional Marketing International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giroux v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2014cv00058
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharel L. Giroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Giroux v. America's Servicing Company et al
as 1:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Todd J. Giroux
Defendant:
America's Servicing Company and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giroux v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2011cv00294
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Sharel L. Giroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
