Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Family Dollar Stores v. TSAI's Investment, Inc.
as 23-1822
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
TSAI's Investment, Inc., a Missouri Corporation
Defendant:
City of University City and Novus Management Co.
Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC v. TSAI's Investment, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00572
Defendant:
City of University City, TSAI's Investment, Inc and Novus Management Co.
Plaintiff:
Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cottages Senior Housing of Belton v. City of Belton, Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00557
Defendant:
City of Belton, Missouri, Briar Creek Villas, L.P., Freddy's Land, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cottages Senior Housing of Belton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ida Smith v. All persons claiming a present, et al
as 17-2005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALL PERSONS CLAIMING A PRESENT OR FUTURE INTEREST, PAUL HOFFMAN, JANE HOFFMAN WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE CHESTERFIELD
Ida Smith v. All persons claiming a present, et al
as 12-1882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IDA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL HOFFMAN, JANE HOFFMAN-WALKER, DAVID A. BORNN, Trustee of the GAF Trust and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
EMILY J. BRATTON
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. SMITH, ELOISE V. SMITH, WAYNE CHESTERFIELD and others
Defendant:
MONIQUE FRANCOIS, PEDRITO FRANCOIS, SUSAN GREER LITTLEFIELD and others
Mary Fritz Revocable Trust Dated June 28, 2005 v. USCOC of Greater Missouri, LLC d/b/a U.S. Cellular et al
as 4:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Mary Fritz Revocable Trust Dated June 28, 2005
Defendant:
USCOC of Greater Missouri, LLC d/b/a U.S. Cellular, Board of Zoning Adjustment, County of Franklin, State of Missouri, Gordon Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
