Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55625
Plaintiff:
CHANDRALEKHA WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, RAJASKARAN WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, EAST MEETS WEST EXCURSIONS and others
Defendant:
AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware, limited liability company and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Not Yet Classified:
DORDELLAS FINANCE CORPORATION and MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A.
3Rd Party Defendant:
M/V BEIJING, erroneously sued as the M/V Cosco Beijing and CAPETANISSA MARITIME CORPORATION
Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55629
Plaintiff:
CHANDRALEKHA WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, RAJASKARAN WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, EAST MEETS WEST EXCURSIONS and others
Defendant:
AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware, limited liability company and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Not Yet Classified:
M/V BEIJING, erroneously sued as the M/V Cosco Beijing and CAPETANISSA MARITIME CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
DORDELLAS FINANCE CORPORATION and MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A.
Plains Marketing, L.P., v. Radiant Acquisitions 1, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2015cv00218
Defendant:
Radiant Acquisitions 1, L.L.C, Radiant Acquisitions 1, L.L.C., Centaurus Capital, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Plains Marketing, L.P.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
LBR Holdings, LLC v. Poulos, et al
as 1:2013cv01081
Plaintiff:
LBR Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Gregory G. Poulos , Jason G. Poulos , Pamela F. Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
