Cases 101 - 110 of 70,034
MOGERMAN v. The United States of America
as 0:2024cv61070
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGERMAN
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
MOGERMAN v. The United States of America
as 0:2024cv61068
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGERMAN
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Marin et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Steve Marin and Mary Gonzales
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Vasquez-Potter v. The United States of America
as 8:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Augusto Vasquez-Potter
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
VAN MATRE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
SHEYANNE VAN MATRE, KARTER VAN MATRE and KENYANA BADDERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUNCIE HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dicks, Jr. v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
James Dicks, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Madison v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Madison
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Gearity v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
John Gearity
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Griest v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Edward Griest
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Harrison v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
David Harrison
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
