Cases 141 - 150 of 227
CARLSON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv64586
Plaintiff:
WARREN W. CARLSON, WARREN W. CARLSON and WARREN W. CARLSON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MULHULL v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH F. MULHULL
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOLUSKY v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
GLENN MOLUSKY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GUNDER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 2:2008cv06029
Plaintiff:
HERALD R. GUNDER
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC., CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MINDLER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 5:2008cv05807
Plaintiff:
RICHARD T. MINDLER
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Masters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01872
Plaintiff:
Earl L. Masters
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COLLINS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv04742
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. COLLINS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEVAULT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89558
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. DEVAULT
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GASSNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89240
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GASSNER, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPENCER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89342
Plaintiff:
EARL W. SPENCER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
