Torts - Injury Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 161 - 170 of 5,163
LALABEKYAN v. VAZIRI
as 1:2023cv01994
Plaintiff: GAYANE LALABEKYAN
Defendant: MOHAMMAD REZA VAZIRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BOWEN v. HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
as 1:2023cv01981
Plaintiff: FEKRA BOWEN
Defendant: HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Breathe DC v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01970
Plaintiff: BREATHE DC
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff: KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant: 1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
HALL v. WRAY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01908
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: Director CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
HALL v. WRAY
as 1:2023cv01909
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
TESITOR v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff: CHARLES TESITOR
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
POPPLEWELL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv01877
Plaintiff: RICK POPPLEWELL
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
COOK v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv01864
Plaintiff: TREVON COOK
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?