Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Hollis et al v. Kaplan et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Stephen E Hollis and Christy Hollis
Defendant:
Bertram D Kaplan , Bertram D Kaplan MD PLLC , Andrew Kanik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavy et al v. TLD Logistics Services Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Andrew Peavy , Dorcine Peavy , Larry Peavy and others
Defendant:
TLD Logistics Services Inc and Terry Tichenor
Counter_claimant:
TLD Logistics Services Inc and Terry Tichenor
Counter_defendant:
Andrew Peavy and Dorcine Peavy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Quist v. Mason et al
as 2:2014cv02015
Plaintiff:
Andrew O'Quist
Defendant:
Paul Mason and B & N Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moss v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moss
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Foster v. Essick Air Products Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Andrew Foster
Defendant:
Essick Air Products Inc and Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Penson et al v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Andrew Penson and Crystal Penson
Defendant:
Monty Layne Hamilton and Tennessee Steel Haulers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Beasley v. Ingram et al
as 4:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Andrew Beasley
Defendant:
Jerry Wayne Ingram and United Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Morris v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
James Joel Morris
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC and Kenneth Andrew Hayslip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2010cv01473
Plaintiff:
Loretta Andrews
Defendant:
Wyeth , Pfizer Inc , Pharmacia & Upjohn Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
