Cases 11 - 20 of 42
David Schied v. United States, et al
as 21-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Schied, one of the Sovereign American People, a totally and permanently disabled RECENT QUAD-AMPUTEE, CRIME VICTIM, Common Law and Civil Rights sui juris GRIEVANT/CLAIMANT/BENEFICIARY (BENEFICIARY/RELATOR)
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Donald Trump, in his public capacity as former U.S. PRESIDENT for the UNITED STATES, Denise Paige Hood, in her private capacity and public capacity as "chief judge" for the USDCEDM and others
Stone v. EBAY et al
as 5:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lamont Stone
Defendant:
EBAY, Microsoft, FNU Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Trump
as 1:2021cv04637
Plaintiff:
Felix Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caston v. Finner et al
as 5:2021cv06098
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Troy Finner, Houston P.D., Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bui v. United States of America, The et al
as 0:2021cv01156
Defendant:
Hospital Lines Services, Joe Biden, Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easley v. State of California, et al
as 5:2021cv00893
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Company, Donald Trump, Katarina Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wesberry v. Trump
as 1:2021cv00348
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Wesberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tinker v. Johnson et al
as 8:2020cv02390
Defendant:
James Simons, Joseph Biden, Dawn Tinker and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela R Tinker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wesberry v. Trump
as 1:2020cv01293
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Wesberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hong Gan v. Donald Trump
as 2:2019cv08849
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Hong Gan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
