Cases 11 - 20 of 66
In RE: C-Truc 7, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv13937
Petitioner:
L&M Botruc Rental, LLC and C-Truc 7, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Sidney Boutte
3Rd Party Defendant:
Expeditors & Production Services Company and ENSCO Offshore Company
Cross Defendant:
EPS Cargo Handlers Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Smith v. Ensco Offshore Company
as 2:2017cv03520
Plaintiff:
Troy Smith
Defendant:
ENSCO Offshore Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Hurst v. ENSCO Offshore Company
as 2:2016cv03690
Defendant:
ENSCO Offshore Company
Plaintiff:
Sonny Milton Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Vannoy, II v. ENSCO Offshore Company et al
as 2:2016cv02232
Defendant:
ENSCO Offshore Company, ENSCO International Company, Pride International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Vannoy, II
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Vanacor v. ENSCO Offshore Company
as 2:2015cv04998
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vanacor
Defendant:
ENSCO Offshore Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1916
Hinkie v. ENSCO Offshore Company
as 2:2015cv01761
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hinkie
Defendant:
ENSCO Offshore Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Jordan v. Ensco Offshore Company
as 2:2015cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jordan
Defendant:
Ensco Offshore Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Ensco Offshore Company v. M/V Satilla
as 14-20676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ENSCO OFFSHORE COMPANY, as Owner of the modu ENSCO 74 for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Claimant - Appellant:
KRISTEN GEHARD JEBSEN SKIPSREDERI AS and SKS OBO & TANKERS AS
Clay v. ENSCO Offshore Company et al
as 2:2014cv02508
Plaintiff:
Bobby Clay
Defendant:
ENSCO Offshore Company and ENSCO Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Ard et al v. ALFA Laval, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01832
Defendant:
Riley Power, Inc., Trane US, Inc., URS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ard and Judy Ard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
