Cases 11 - 20 of 103
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff:
CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03910
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSE HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez v. PSAN PI/WD TRUST et al
as 1:2023cv20247
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
PSAN PI/WD TRUST d/b/a THE TAKATA AIRBAG TORT COMPENSATION TRUST FUND, BRAMAN IMPORTS, INC. d/b/a BRAMAN HONDA, PSAN PI/WD TRUST doing business as THE TAKATA AIRBAG TORT COMPENSATION TRUST FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nieves-Cordero v. Bureau of Prisons, MDC Guaynabo et al
as 3:2022cv01553
Plaintiff:
Francis Alexander Nieves-Cordero
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, MDC Guaynabo, Merrick B. Garland, Angel L. Adan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16501
Plaintiff:
JOSE HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HERNANDEZ LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12809
Plaintiff:
MARCOS JOSE HERNANDEZ LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez Aceves v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez Aceves
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
