Cases 11 - 20 of 55
BARCELO v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv00017
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Teva Women's Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLLE BARCELO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acevedo et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
as 4:2019cv04051
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony, H.C., a minor, Mandy Mace and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Spence v. Arco/Murray Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00985
Defendant:
Arco/Murray Associates, Inc., Arco/Murray National Construction Co., Inc. and Seretta Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shi-Lo Nichole Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nichols v. Baylor Scott & White Health
as 3:2019cv01883
Defendant:
Baylor Scott & White Health and Baylor Research Institute
Plaintiff:
Christy Nichols
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Nichols v White, et al
as 6:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Michael Cody White and Ecolab, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tanya Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nichols v. 3M Company
as 1:2019cv00314
Plaintiff:
Ryan L. Nichols
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. FCA US, LLC
as 4:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Zachary Nichols
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. United States of America Et Al
as 7:2019cv00001
Defendant:
United States Of America and GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Salvador v. Nichols et al
as 4:2018cv02720
Defendant:
Carl Nichols and Admiral Merchants Motor Freight
Plaintiff:
Ana Salvador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Kroger Texas L.P.
as 3:2018cv00953
Plaintiff:
Herschel E. Nichols and Tona Batis
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP, US Regency Shiloh Springs LLC , The Kroger Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
