Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Wideman v. Sink, Sr. et al
as 2:2021cv00482
Defendant:
George Sink, Sr. and Robert E Treacy, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Charles Wideman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91685
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65441
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLAN SINKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDRANO DIAZ SINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63890
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KARIN JHUSEF MEDRANO DIAZ SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26195
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sink v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02253
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Curtis Sink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00777
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00671
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
AARON SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Dorsett Industries, Inc., Tandus Centiva, Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Johnson
Special Master:
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Petitioner:
The Carpet and Rug Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MCCLAIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03126
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HAGER, JOSHUA WIKHOLM, DANNY BRADEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
