Cases 191 - 200 of 664
Robare et al v. AC And S, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01291
Plaintiff:
Gordon Robare and Joan Robare
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swain et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02168
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amcord Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Swain and Kathy Swain
DUNLAP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60043
Plaintiff:
BYRL D DUNLAP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , CRANE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Donald Sellers
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane Inc. , Cyprus Amax Minerals Company , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company , CBS Corporation , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Counter_defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc., H & S Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurley et al v. Alltite Gaskets et al
as 1:2012cv00462
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Hurley and Bonnie Hurley
Defendant:
Alltite Gaskets, Anchor Packing Company, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harper v. Alltite Gaskets et al
as 1:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
Claude A. Harper and Carol Johnson Harper
Defendant:
Alltite Gaskets , Anchor Packing Company, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Covington et al v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00461
Plaintiff:
Lisa Covington , Marquise Garnes , Otis Garnes and others
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois Glass Co. , Durabla Manufacturing Company, Universal Refractories Company and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
John Crane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company:
Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company:
Amtrol Inc
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin:
Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc:
Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co:
Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur:
IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val:
Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc:
O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company:
RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc:
Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
Manus v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert G Manus
Defendant:
3M Company, Airgas Merchant Gases, LLC, Borg-Warner Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
