Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Swartz v. Acme Markets, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03911
Plaintiff:
Eric Swartz
Defendant:
Acme Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPEER v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv06791
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE SPEER
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC., ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., BAYSHORE MALL 1A, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PELIKOSKI et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv05130
Plaintiff:
NANCY PELIKOSKI and ROBERT PELIKOSKI
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , ALBERTSONS COMPANIES and JOHN DOE RESPONSIBLE PARTY(S)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAPENT et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2016cv03673
Plaintiff:
JOANNE G. LAPENT and JOSEPH LAPENT
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BERROCAL et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2016cv01797
Plaintiff:
ALBILDA BERROCAL and LUIS BERROCAL
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MORRISSEY v. ACME MARKETS, INC et al
as 1:2016cv01658
Plaintiff:
DEBRA MORRISSEY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC , JOHN DOE, INC. and JOHN ROE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DISOMMA v. ACME MARKETS, INC et al
as 1:2016cv01595
Plaintiff:
NOELLE DISOMMA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC , SUPERVALU, INC. , SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEAN et al v. ALBERTSONS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01206
Plaintiff:
ARIF DEAN and JOSEPHINE DEAN
Defendant:
ALBERTSONS, LLC, SUPERVALU, INC. and ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPINO et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
CAROL J. SPINO and BARRY SPINO
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and JOHN DOE COMPANY 1-10
Cross_claimant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
SKORITOWSKI et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2015cv06877
Plaintiff:
LINDA SKORITOWSKI and JEROME SKORITOWSKI
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
