Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Bell et al v. Arvin Meritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Donald Bell and Sumiko Bell
Defendant:
Arvin Meritor, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part:
Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation:
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co:
CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation:
Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc:
Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation:
Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc:
IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International:
Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation:
Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation:
Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company:
Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor:
Zurn Industries LLC
THOMPSON et al v. AUTOZONE INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67268
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON and BERTHA THOMPSON
Defendant:
AUTOZONE INC., AUTOZONE WEST INC, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Autozone Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06226
Defendant:
A W Chesterton Company, Autozone Inc, Autozone West Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bertha Thompson and John Thompson
BOUCHARD et al v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66270
Plaintiff:
LOLA BOUCHARD and MICHAEL BOUCHARD
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, FOSS MARITIME COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER USA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bouchard et al v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 2:2011cv00458
Plaintiff:
Lola Bouchard and Michael Bouchard
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Foss Maritime Company, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
RICCO et al v. ADVANCE MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60031
Plaintiff:
FRANK RICCO
Defendant:
ADVANCE MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. , AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION , BACOU-DALLOZ SAFETY, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY , ADVANCE MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricco v. Advance Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv04713
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC, Trane US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Ricco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hruska et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2010cv02214
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc.,, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Plaintiff:
Frances Hruska, Donald Hruska and Douglas Hruska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
HEINMILLER v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv61103
Plaintiff:
JOHN HEINMILLER and JOHN HEINMILLER
Defendant:
ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING CO., INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
