Cases 21 - 30 of 371
JACQUES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22147
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JACQUES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATTHEW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16507
Plaintiff:
JACQUES MATTHEW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zhivago Jacques Johnson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02737
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Zhivago Jacques Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clay v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01966
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jacque Clay
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABALE GNALEGA v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
REUEL JACQUES ABALE GNALEGA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
JACQUES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10906
Plaintiff:
ERIC JACOB JACQUES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACQUES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10423
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAYMOND JACQUES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ruffin v. Drax Biomass, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jacques Ruffin
Defendant:
Drax Biomass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07223
Plaintiff:
JACQUES GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacques v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jacques
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
