Cases 31 - 40 of 129
MCBRIDE v. C R BARD INC et al
as 1:2020cv02327
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE, C R BARD INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MARLENE MCBRIDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WASHINGTON v. C R BARD INC et al
as 1:2020cv02328
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE, MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC and others
Plaintiff:
MALILAE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG et al
as 1:2020cv01750
Defendant:
EDWARD C. MALESIC, DONALD WUERL, ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST AND ST. JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'CONNOR v. UNITED KINGDOM et al
as 1:2020cv01775
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, UNITED KINGDOM and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CLEMONS v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01551
Plaintiff:
FRANCES CLEMONS
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 6-10 and JOHN, 1-5 DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHN DOES 1-8 v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOES 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. CHUNG
as 1:2019cv03266
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
DAVID CHUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'CONNOR v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2019cv03246
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, JESUS TREVINO, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALLACE v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2019cv02168
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20 and MITCH MCCONNELL
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
COULSTON et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv02060
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 2, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
Walter Coulston, Sr., Stella D. Coulston, Individually, and as a Personal Representative of the Estate of Walter E. Coulston, Jr. and STELLA D. COULSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
