Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Young v Eli Lilly, et al
as 1:2011cv03555
Defendant:
Eli Lilly
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41132
Plaintiff:
JAMES W YOUNG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41124
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Young v Eli Lilly, et al
as 1:2011cv01536
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Young
Defendant:
Eli Lilly, U.S. Government U.S. Food & Drug Admin., Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James G Young, II v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al
as 2:2011cv01003
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc. and Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
James G Young, II
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
YOUNG et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62181
Plaintiff:
LEAH YOUNG , JAMES A. YOUNG and DON A. YOUNG
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC , CELOTEX CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32389
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. YOUNG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
YOUNG et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62246
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. YOUNG and JEANNE F YOUNG
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Eli Lilly et al
as 1:2010cv03526
Plaintiff:
James A. Young
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and U.S. Food & Drug Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55586
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. YOUNG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
