Cases 41 - 50 of 205
Grange v. MVConnect, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Defendant:
MVCONNECT, LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mehl v. LG Chem Ltd et al
as 6:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mehl
Defendant:
LG Chem Ltd, Does 1-50 and LG Chem Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. YRC, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00849
Defendant:
YRC, Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doad et al v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00645
Plaintiff:
Sarabjit Doad and Gurjit S. Doad
Defendant:
Leroy Tillman, Jr., C.R. England, Inc., Jane Doe Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Hannu et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
John Doe Driver 2, Joel Hannu, Baljinder Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Martin and Shawn Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Compton v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00338
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Amazon.com, Inc. and J.W. Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff:
Connie Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grange v. Collateral Recovery LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Kevin Haevischer, Collateral Recovery LLC Bond Company, Collateral Recovery LLC Auto Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grange v. Prestige Financial Services Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01561
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 2-10, Prestige Financial Services Inc., Repossession Company Auto Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clark v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv01518
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Kristan Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe 3 v. Catlin Gabel School
as 3:2020cv00353
Defendant:
Catlin Gabel School
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
