Cases 41 - 50 of 556
DRAKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20591
Plaintiff:
DETRICK DRAKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drake v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
LaVenus Drake
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DRAKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14859
Plaintiff:
HOLLAND DRAKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Drake et al
as 1:2023cv04433
Plaintiff:
Delvi Duran Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kevin Drake, Nilson Mendez-Matos and Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DRAKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12803
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN DRAKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ASHWORTH v. EUROFINS DONOR & PRODUCT TESTING, INC., F/K/A EUROFINS VRL et al
as 5:2023cv01958
Defendant:
EUROFINS DONOR & PRODUCT TESTING, INC., EUROFINS VRL, AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ASHWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson, Seth Lacroix, Ivan May and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Dussett v. Johnson et al
as 7:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Mary Dussett
Defendant:
Jerry Wayne Johnson and Drake Enterprises of Lincolnton, NC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DRAKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07404
Plaintiff:
KALIB PATRICK RYAN DRAKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
