Cases 41 - 50 of 85
SIDORSKI v. TORRES et al
as 1:2014cv03075
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SIDORSKI
Defendant:
FRANCISCO TORRES , ESTES EXPRESS LINES , ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOCHANSKA v. HAUSE et al
as 1:2014cv01586
Plaintiff:
BEATA KOCHANSKA
Defendant:
MICHAEL HAUSE, ABC, INC. (1-5) and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INGLIMA v. PETROWSKI et al
as 3:2014cv00711
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH INGLIMA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPH PETROWSKI, ABC, INC. (1-5) and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYES v. BOUDRIA et al
as 2:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
SIMONE REYES
Defendant:
JACQUELIN BOUDRIA, LAWRENCE BOUDRIA, ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
RYAN THOMAS , M.L. RUBERTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. , ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatton v. Lake Region Urgent Care, P.C. et al
as 3:2013cv03004
Plaintiff:
Natalya Levin Hatton
Defendant:
Lake Region Urgent Care, P.C. and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVIS v. LANGLEY et al
as 1:2013cv06847
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEVIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. LANGLEY , JAC MEDI TRANDPORT , ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cross_claimant:
JAC MEDI TRANDPORT and DAVID J. LANGLEY
Cross_defendant:
ABC, INC. (1-5) and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacheco v. Davalos et al
as 3:2013cv05972
Defendant:
Frank Xavier Davalos , John and Jane Does, 1-5, Kitsap County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Karissa Marie Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baucom v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00397
Plaintiff:
Robin Baucom
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DINH v. LUU et al
as 3:2013cv04186
Plaintiff:
NANCY N. DINH
Defendant:
KHIEM T. LUU, MINH M. TO, ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
