Cases 41 - 50 of 210
Howard et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
John Michael Howard and Kimberly Ann Howard
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis v. Mother's Love Hospice LLC
as 1:2022cv03078
Plaintiff:
John Michael Davis
Defendant:
Mother's Love Hospice LLC doing business as Trinity Hospice Care of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
MATTINGLY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16284
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL MATTINGLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SLOTA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14747
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL SLOTA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIDWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13645
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL SIDWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BIGLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15295
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL BIGLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alessi et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11757
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Breen, James Monarch, Richard Mascia and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
GRAHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09160
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL GRAHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stenberg v. Cafferty et al
as 2:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
John Michael Stenberg and John Michael Christopher Stenberg
Defendant:
John Cafferty, Mayli Walsh, Wesley Somerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McLeod v. Bryant et al
as 2:2022cv10729
Plaintiff:
John Michael McLeod
Defendant:
Michael Bryant and Internal Revenue Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
