Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Perry v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv81448
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Perry
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERRY v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv61059
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR W. PERRY, ARTHUR W. PERRY and EMMA M. PERRY
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PERRY v. INC. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2009cv61059
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR W. PERRY and EMMA M. PERRY
Defendant:
INC. OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PERRY v. A.C.S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv70994
Plaintiff:
LAURNA M. PERRY
Defendant:
A.C.S., INC., INC ARMSTRONG WORLD, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PERRY et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65933
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE PERRY and DANA M. PERRY
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PERRY et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE PERRY and DANA M. PERRY
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.
Cross Defendant:
FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION, GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
